My muse seems to be taking a vacation. I have a few ideas and things to research once some RL problems get addressed. (nothing that wouldn’t be improved by gobs of money, alas!)
So, not doing any writing for release right now. I still have the last ten chapters of the 2nd book, my answer to being indecisive or greedy enough not to choose sides in the fen debate.
I do know I may do a major rewrite of it someday, to expand parts a few comments said were too sparse. But then again, I do like the old dramatic thing of leaving some things off-stage. One of the things I like are stories where not every detail is there, the FX people and sometimes over-detailed books I’ve read were far more disappointing than leaving me areas to ponder. My imagination is often more vivid than what the author describes in detail… leaving me disappointed.
Its a tricky balance, as you have to not leave too many areas for the imagination to play with or the reader will drop out of the story. Too much detail, and I wonder what kind of idiot the author thinks their audience is, to explain the plot development that was obvious 100 pages ago. In great detail, yet.
Then to complicate things more, is using specialized knowledge the reader/viewer doesn’t know. Like if a bit of knowledge in a mystery was known to the lead in mystery, but never mentioned until page 329 while they wander around the story in circles forgetting it until the climax. I don’t mind if they’ve forgotten it on camera, or some kind of sleight of hand they didn’t realize they knew it until later. That’s perfect, as the PC or reader should be smacking their heads saying, ‘oh, shit! how did we miss that?’ That’s the perfect way to do it. But not foreshadowing or leaving the hook out ahead of time, and using a deus ex machina just plain sucks.
On the other hand, I think I’m up to the 4th hand by now
, there is the word or phrase that just boggles me. I know my vocab is large for my region, but sometimes the net polyglot nails me. And I’m coming to really hate online dictionaries as they never tell me what I’m looking for. I was looking for ‘epiphany’ as a synonym for realization, and all I found in the 1st three sources was ‘enlightenment.’ Not the same. Finally my internal thesaurus found it. So I don’t want to put anything to regional or period in my stories, as I want to communicate the idea without forcing my readers to stop reading to look it up. There is a handful of terms that brings me to a screeching halt, and I’m reluctant to read those stories or authors now.
Well, on to summarize this rambling, my hopes for writing:
- Not too much detail. Some things offstage are far more effective than onstage. Twilight Zone dealing with censors was much scarier than many horror movies with their buckets of blood. A powerfully written almost-kiss can get more interest than a 5 page love scene.
- Enough detail. Don’t leave too many or too big holes in the narrative. Covering the missing sections or a transitions over time, lightly is okay. This is probably a weakness of mine, as expanding what I’ve already alluded to, in detail, feels like ‘dumbing down’ the story.
- Use specialized knowledge carefully. Too much and you’re showing off, not telling a story. Using it, without foreshadowing, at the end is a cheat. (amazingly, our hero just got that gadget in parcel post to make all Klingon engines lose power for thirty minutes…) I’ve got a bridge in Brooklyn, low milage fer ya, lady! [#1 and #3 combine to make a cardinal sin of talking down to the reader]
- Language! Language! Language! Be really careful to stay reasonably close to the vocabulary of your audience. That’s why jargons and net slang are so dangerous in writing, as your readers may have a different hash table in their brains and think you mean what you don’t. Not that you can’t override the default vocab lookup (hash table*) for a specific term, but you should pair a tiny bit of exposition with uncommon usage.
- Hackneyed plots. (didn’t say much at all, maybe in another post)
That’s why most network TV drives me up a wall… I usually can change channels 1/3 of the way in and do something else, as it rarely has any surprises.